Press archive - 2008 >>

Press archive - 2007 >>

Press archive - 2006 >>


Cancer victim DJ told surgeons: 'If my kidney is too far gone don't wake me up!' >>
19 November 2007


Appeal to Blair over £14,000 cancer drug >>
16 November 2007


James Whale calls for early diagnosis and more research >>
16 November 2007


Campaigning Group >>
1 October 2007


James Whale Fund launched >>
27 September 2007


Cancer kidney drug gets green light after hitch >>
31 July 2007


Cancer kidney drug gets green light after hitch >>
31 July 2007


Kidney cancer drug decision hailed as 'major breakthrough' >>
27 July 2007


Kidney cancer drug ruling condemned >>
10 July 2007


Cancer drug rejected for NHS use >>
9 July 2007


James Whale Fund petitions SMC >>
7 May 2007


Doctors froze my kidney to save my life >>
24 April 2007


Trust backs down on Sutent prescription >>
18 April 2007


Sutent achieves first line EAU approval for kidney cancer >>
22 March 2007


James Whale appears on BBC Radio 2 >>
19 March 2007


The cost of staying alive >>
6 March 2007


'Life-saving' kidney cancer drug rejected over high costs >>
25 February 2007


Kidney cancer victims denied 'wonder drugs' >>
25 February 2007


Letter to Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt, MP Secretary of State for Health >>
8 February 2007


Funding can depend on where you live >>
5 February 2007


Sutent (sunitinib malate) launched for treatment of advanced kidney cancer >>
22 January 2007


Sutent launch >>
22 January 2007


Bayer's announcement on sorafenib >>
11 January 2007


Cancer kidney drug gets green light after hitch

Published in the North West Evening Mail

Top doctors have given the go-ahead for a new kidney cancer drug to be made available to patients in Cumbria - despite turning it down earlier this year.

The new drug, called Sunitab, is an initial treatment for kidney cancer. It is not seen as a cure.

It gained approval this week from the North East and Cumbria Cancer Drug Approvals Group, which includes doctors and other health professionals involved in the care of patients with cancer in the region.

Their decision is subject to formal guidance from the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence — the national watchdog for the NHS.

Earlier this year a request for the drug to be used as a second-line palliative treatment for patients whose initial treatment had failed was turned down by the group.

At that time, following consideration of the available medical and scientific evidence, the panel decided that there was no evidence of the drug’s cost-effectiveness as a second-line treatment. It therefore felt it could not approve it for use.

The group said it would review its position when further evidence became available later in the year.

This new evidence has now been considered and it shows that the drug can lead to improvements in the quality of life when used as an initial treatment.

Ian Dalton, chair of the cancer drug approvals group, said: “When we first considered this drug at the beginning of the year, the request was for it to be used as a second line palliative treatment when the initial treatment had failed.

“After considering the most up to date medical and scientific evidence available, we felt we couldn’t support its use as a second line treatment. But at the time we said as soon as more evidence became available we would give this early consideration, which we have done this week.

“Following these discussions we have decided that the drug can lead to improvements in the quality of life for patients when used as an initial treatment.”

The group stressed that it has not changed its position on the drug’s use as a second line treatment.